Technology, Religion, and Politics all in one place.
RSS:
Publications
Comments

iPad vs Kindle vs Nook

        Was reading the NY Times Technology section and read a point-counterpoint on why the iPad will be a Kindle Killer and why the Kindle will be just fine. I think they are both great products and will peacefully co-exist.
        If anything this is bad for the Nook, the Nook has an easy access book store with a color display of the store, but so does the new iBooks store and the iBooks store looks a lot more easier to browse. Point Apple. Now like the Kindle, the Nook uses E ink for page display making it easier on the eyes for long term reading. The iPad uses an LED-backlight which is more for short term reading and not as easy on the eyes. Point Nook & Kindle.
        But the Nook is priced at $259 same as the Kindle so question becomes who has the bigger store library? Point Kindle. For folks that like the color display and are more short term at a time readers (this would be me) but can then also use the Kindle app on the iPad to access the Amazon library and want a little more out of their e-reader Point iPad and Kindle per the Kindle app.
        So bottom line is Kindle can survive in the iPad ecosystem, but I don’t think the Nook can. Amazon will sell a ton of e-books to folks with an iPad with a far superior and well established library.

  • Share/Bookmark

2 Comments to "iPad vs Kindle vs Nook"

  1. Gary Higgins's Gravatar Gary Higgins
    February 2, 2010 - 4:59 am | Permalink

    Nook and Kindle don’t charge for downloads, IPad charges for downloads. The Nook and Kindle come in a paperback book size, IPad is larger and less convenient when throwing into your bag or pocket. Books for the Kindle and Nook are less expensive, by significant margin. The Nook is the only reader with a brick and mortar store, that allows you to browse hard copy books AND ebooks while in the store. Nook owners can lend ebooks to other Nook owners.